Women’s rights can’t be wrong

Tammy Wynette said it well really. Sometimes it’s hard to be a woman (I’ll selectively ignore the rest of her song lyrics for the purpose of this blog). But she had a point. It is hard. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not complaining – I’m not saying I want to start pissing standing up or take testosterone replacement, but I feel quite justified in my right to moan about the burdens that womanhood has placed on my shoulders.

I attended a discussion group recently. The topic was whether lesbians in this country should care about lesbians in other countries – where approaches are more hostile – and what we should do about it. The question prompted a variety of responses. In the main, it was heartening to hear that people cared; they wanted to help, but weren’t sure how. The idea of setting up a human trafficking ring to bring over Nigerian lesbians was raised, but as with most good ideas, practicality reared its ugly head. We just aren’t well connected enough to the underworld of London.

But what of those people who are subjected in other countries to harsh and often brutal responses to their sexuality? How exactly can we help? It’s not like hunger or poverty – I can’t just pack an old shoebox full of unwanted toys and clothes and send it off with a wing and a prayer. With the exception of talking/writing and, in doing so, raising awareness, there’s very little I personally can do that is short of packing my rucksack and heading off with a ‘Gay and Proud’ placard and a big red target painted on my back.

It’s a depressing thought and a sobering one at that – I am lucky. Sure, it was tough telling my Dad that I thought that rather than saving up for a wedding he should start a fund for IVF if he ever wanted a grandchild, however, my life is not in danger and I am not persecuted for my beliefs.

It was with interest that I listened to one person explaining that we should leave some matters up to the people in their own country to sort out. This caused some outrage, but I remained quiet, not sure what to make of such a statement. The person argued that, if such laws (such as anti-gay legislation) had been voted in by the people of the country, or the main religious movement there dictated that it was wrong, it wasn’t for us to go over with our rainbow flags and demand change. What about the gay people who are born into that sort of country, some asked. ‘They can just leave and come here or somewhere more tolerant.’

This is exactly the sort of argument that some people base their anti-Iraq sentiments on – it’s not up to us to go sorting out other countries’ issues and problems based on our own principles of democracy. There is some logic in this perhaps. It would certainly lead to less conflicts and an easier life for people over here.

However, this laissez-faire attitude is like putting the brakes on world development. It’s the ‘let someone else worry about that because it doesn’t affect me’ kind of thought that allows bad stuff to continue and gain momentum, making it not just bad but terrifying.

Sure, it’s not really my problem that there’s a lesbian in Iran living in fear because it’s against her religion to be attracted to women. She might get beaten for it. She may just have to shut up, shut down, spend her life in denial/hiding. What can I do about it? I’ll just thank my lucky stars that geography saved me from a life of misery.

I’m sorry, but I can’t do this. It just doesn’t feel right to turn a blind eye. How on earth will things ever improve if we don’t consider the world as a global community, as opposed to one fragmented by man-made borders that our ancestors gave names to?

As a lesbian, you are given a label. I am therefore more likely to be interested in the lives and fates of others like myself. But going back to my original point (if you can remember back that far!), what about my role as a woman? Surely there’s enough other women that I don’t have to care too much about their rights – I’ve got enough on my plate with gay issues haven’t I? Yet another question that I find hard to answer and one that arose from the discussion group.

While talking about the persecution of gay people abroad, we stumbled across the subject of strip clubs. There was a general consensus in the room that, as women who like women, we should care about women’s issues. It’s a fairly logical argument I suppose, but not everyone agreed. Despite the common conception that many lesbians are avid feminists, many aren’t much interested in the rights of women beyond their own sphere of influence. It got me thinking… should lesbians be expected to carry the torch of women’s rights moreso than any other woman? Historically, yes, this has often been the case, giving many lesbians their atypical ‘man-hating’ label in the process.

The subject arose when it was discussed that a lesbian club in London featured women pole-dancing and stripping. ‘So what?’ argued one woman. ‘Like men, I like looking and it’s just a bit of fun.’ Another vehemently argued the opposite – that it is this kind of ‘fun’ that damages women worldwide, perpetuating the myth that women are a commodity that can be bought and sold as readily as a cup of coffee – that it is acceptable to judge women aesthetically and solely from a sexual standpoint. It is a tough call – I hear the first woman – why should she care? Just because she sleeps with women in her private life, like many thousands of men, she enjoys looking at women sexually and feels justified in doing so. By being gay, she didn’t take an oath to look out for the rights of other women, gay or straight.

So why is it that the majority of the group took the opposite approach. ‘Who better to care about the needs of women than us?’ said one. And maybe she’s right. Being gay by no means suggests that you must be a feminist or an activist of any form, but the nature of our sexuality means that we take an interest in women and the needs of women, both straight and lesbian.

As women, we should be outraged at the idea of women stripping for us in a club because they are one of us, regardless of our sexuality. By ignoring the issue, we are agreeing in principle to the sexualisation of young women, deeming it acceptable even to other women who, in reality, should be the friend and not the foe. On a superficial level, most gay women would have to be chemically castrated to not find the idea of half-naked dancing women attractive, but we must think with our heads not our libidos. We have a duty to do so.

Maybe men don’t have to do this, I am sure many don’t as they gain gratification from the idea that these attractive, often drug-dependent or poverty-stricken young women are actually dancing for their pleasure (and not the dirty cash that pays their undeclared wages that are not protected by employment laws). Yet I for one cannot switch off and just think of them solely as sexual objects. I see another ‘me’ (albeit less good looking and with arguably smaller tits and a less flexible hip action).

I am well aware that there is an argument, often by women in the business themselves, that stripping is a life decision that is well informed and well paid; that they are not coerced and not exploited. Individually, for those women, that is great. I am glad to hear it. Yet it cannot be ignored that in many cases this is just not true. And stripping for cash is often a pre-cursor to a much more dangerous activity – prostitution.

Should we as women shoulder more responsibility? It seems like many of us believe yes, myself included, however my reasons for believing this are kind of vague. I just care. I am just not really sure why I do.

Being a woman is a label that many of us share. It is a unique identity, yet is also so generic. Beyond my own experience of being a female, I care deeply about others’ experience of it too. It should be something positive – something that can be freely explored within the understanding and accepting framework of a more general society. However, as is the case for many lesbians, many women too face discrimination and stereotyping, in this country and further afield.

I strongly believe that I have a duty to care about other people, whatever their sexuality, religion, race or indeed gender. If being a woman means that I better understand the needs of other women, then I should take this belief and put it to good use. The women’s movement has come on leaps and bounds in this century and the last, but it is by no means a fait accompli. For this reason, I will continue to write about these issues and try to encourage others to feel the same. By staying quiet, I am tacitly acknowledging that there is nothing that needs to change in the world and that isn’t something that I am prepared to accept…



Filed under Uncategorized

5 responses to “Women’s rights can’t be wrong

  1. I can feel your passion for the subject! It’s certainly a point that has rolled through my head – is it that somehow because we are women and love women, we are more likely to care? Should we care more? I know I feel strongly about gender equality, about the sexual exploitation of women because despite a certain level of emancipation we are not equal. It’s painfully obvious everywhere from the rate of abuse and rape to representation of women in the media to pay inequality in the work place. And indeed, what can we do? For some it will be to campaign and join Amnesty International to help women less fortunate. For others it will be to live their life as strong women or any number of other choices.. I think we should have the right to choose if and how we honour our gender, that freedom to choose being part of what the feminist movement fought for, but I do hope do not forget and allow our progress to halt because despite the sometimes illusion that we have reached equality, we have not.

    • cloblog

      Thanks for commenting! Yes, I totally agree and can see that you too feel strongly on the issue. It is a tough call, but like you say, we have the freedom to choose, which is empowering in itself. It’s an ongoing battle, but one that is slowly changing. I will take a look at the blog you have suggested when I get a minute… looks good!

  2. hearthesiren

    hi, i just wanted to let you know that this website has stolen your info and has stolen my blog as well, verbatim. i have filed an infringement complaint and requested it be taken down. you should do the same.


    • cloblog

      Hey – thanks so much for letting me know. The cheek! How did you find out? And, more importantly, where did you file the infringement and how?

  3. Jennifer Drew

    ‘As women, we should be outraged at the idea of women stripping for us in a club because they are one of us, regardless of our sexuality. By ignoring the issue, we are agreeing in principle to the sexualisation of young women, deeming it acceptable even to other women who, in reality, should be the friend and not the foe.’

    Totally agree because lesbianism can never be separated out from how the patriarchal system enforces so-called ‘natural female sexuality.’

    As you so rightly said, irrespective of a woman’s sexual orientation, accepting as ‘natural’ the male-centered representation of all women as men’s dehumanised sexualised commodities does negatively impact on all women’s lives.

    Women and girls continue to experience mundane and everyday male sexual harassment which is commonly dismissed as ‘oh the male was just complimenting you’ whereas in fact this is deliberate expression of male power over women and girls. Not challenging the now ‘normal’ representation and promotion of women and girls as men’s sexual service stations is used to promote such misogyny as ‘natural’ and effectively enforces the widespread belief that women unlike men – are not human but simply ‘sexualised commodities.’

    Believing that viewing other women as sexualised commodities is ‘harmless’ serves to justify and uphold patriarchal views that women and girls are indeed dehumanised sexualised commodities. Not too long ago slavery was deemed to be ‘natural and inevitable because certain groups were deemed to be sub-human – now of course such views are not blatantly promoted. However, women and girls as a group continue to be defined from and for male-centered perspectives.

    Therefore claiming ‘women choose to portray themselves as men’s sexualised commodities’ is a simplistic notion because women and girls are never in a position to ‘freely choose.’ Instead we are subject to social and economic constraints as well as male-centered cultural ideas concerning supposedly appropriate male and female behaviour. This is called ‘biological essentalism’ and is increasingly being used to justify the dehumanisation and reduction of women to sexualised commodities.

    How women are viewed an oppressed in countries such as Iran and Iraq differ from how women continue to be oppressed in white western countries but there are certainly similarities and the primary one is the widespread male-centered belief that men but not women constitute the default human condition, with women perceived as always in relation to the ‘human male.’

    Therefore ‘no woman is an island’ but instead is always subject to social, economic and cultural constraints which are always male-centered and male-defined.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s